CORZ · investment memo
NULL, and correctly so. CORZ's valuation instrument is a SALES multiple (6.6x EV / annualised AI revenue), so no terminal EBIT margin enters the arithmetic at any point and none was set. Had an EBIT-basis DCF been attempted, a terminal margin for a company running a -56% gross margin in one segment would have been INDETERMINATE absent a named, evidenced mechanism. Do not substitute a peer median here.
Four distinct questions, one field each. A price is not a thesis: the trigger below forces a re-underwrite and freezes further purchases — it is never an automatic sell.
A daily close below $13.63 triggers a mandatory re-underwrite and freezes further purchases. It is not an automatic sell unless a separate fundamental invalidation condition has been breached.
Fundamental and falsifiable, never price-based. If one is satisfied the thesis is marked dead and the position is retained only by explicit decision.
Named cause: CoreWeave counterparty concentration, geared through an SPV. This is not diversifiable revenue risk. 83.2% of CORZ's revenue comes from one customer, and the financing is built on that customer's contracts: 1. CoreWeave is ~590MW of a business with essentially no other disclosed colocation customer of scale. AMD is named but unquantified. 2. CoreWeave's own balance sheet is levered: $24,859m of debt against $2,244m of cash, plus $9,563m of non-current operating lease liabilities, on $6,227m of TTM revenue. CoreWeave is itself financing a very large buildout. 3. CORZ assigned certa