Intuit [INTU]
As of 2026-07-29. Spot $333.13. No position verdict; this file scores the Liquidity Criteria and states which vehicle would be correct if the book chose to own it.
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Market capitalisation (diluted) | $92.0bn |
| Enterprise value | $91.2bn |
| Trailing 252-day realised volatility | 48.4% |
| 252-day price range | $255.07 – $807.39 (spot 58.7% below the high) |
The equity is liquid at any size this book would take.
Chosen vehicle: EQUITY (ladder step 1). No argument required, and the alternative is not constructable anyway.
January 2027 chain, Alpaca options snapshot, 2026-07-29:
| Contract | Bid × size | Ask × size | Spread | Open interest | IV | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTU270115C00330000 |
55.24 × 28 | 56.60 × 122 | 2.4% | 356 | 57.3% | 0.607 |
INTU270115C00340000 |
— | — | — | 108 | — | — |
INTU270115C00350000 |
45.76 × 117 | 48.94 × 210 | 6.7% | 290 | 57.0% | 0.547 |
INTU270115C00360000 |
40.75 × 183 | 45.14 × 248 | 10.2% | 310 | 56.3% | 0.517 |
IV 57.3% − realised 48.4% = +8.9 percentage points.
This is where it fails. The deepest open interest anywhere near the money on the January 2027 chain is 356 contracts, and the at-the-money strike quotes 28 × 122.
Put that against the project's own precedents. HCA's entire March-2027 chain carried a maximum of 18 contracts and was called uninvestable; GMED 13; CRDO 78; ISSC 506; KNSA 2,598 across six expiries and was called marginal. Intuit's 356 sits between CRDO and ISSC — squarely in the uninvestable band, on a $92bn company. For comparison, the five names in the enterprise-software cluster ran 2,713–6,771 at their deepest strikes, and ServiceNow's January 2027 $120 call carries 5,582 with a 285 × 81 quote.
The 28-contract bid is the operative number. A 28-lot bid on a $55 option is roughly $154,000 of exit liquidity at the touch. That is not a position; it is a ticket.
This is a clean instance of the recorded rule that market capitalisation does not predict options depth. A $92bn company with a 48% realised vol has a thinner chain than several sub-$10bn names in this coverage.
There is none, on two independent grounds.
Absent an argument, the vehicle is equity. And on this name the equity is not merely the default — it is the only executable choice.
The January 2027 expiry is 5.6 months out against a 12-month target horizon and a five-year implied-path thesis. No expiry is both liquid and long enough — and here even the liquid one is not liquid. By the criteria's own rule the answer is equity. Stated rather than resolved silently.
The Valuation Criteria PASSes at +3.0pp, which is at the edge of the ±3pp noise band. Three specific, observable things decide whether it stays there.
| Monitor | Current | Thesis intact | Thesis breaks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matched-period revenue growth | Q1 +18.3%, Q2 +17.4%, Q3 +10.4%, 9M +14.0% | Q4 FY26 and Q1 FY27 hold ≥12% | A second consecutive matched quarter below 11% takes demonstrated growth below the required 11.2% and flips the verdict |
| TurboTax units | Federal units falling; ~2m manual DIY filers lost; total online paying units guided +2% | The FY2027 season stabilises units while assisted mix keeps rising | Units fall again and assisted growth decelerates below ~25% — the price/mix lever closes |
| Operating margin, ex-restructuring | 27.47% TTM, +5.8pp in three matched years | FY2027 prints ≥29% once the 2026 Plan savings land | FY2027 margin does not expand despite a 17% headcount cut — the savings were competed away |
The base-effect trap, flagged in advance. The $300–340m restructuring charge lands in Q4 FY2026, the seasonally weakest quarter (8–9% operating margin). FY2027 will therefore show flattered year-over-year margin expansion off a depressed base. This is exactly the WDAY defect — a headline +11.5pp that was +4.1pp clean, two-thirds of it a prior-year restructuring base. Any FY2027 margin comparison must be made ex-restructuring on both sides.
Entry timing is the open question, not the thesis. Spot has risen 17.1% in five sessions off a 252-day low of $255.07. The valuation work supports ownership; it says nothing about owning it after a 17% week.