Reddit [RDDT]
As of 2026-07-29 · spot $178.345 (close 2026-07-28) · chain pulled live from Alpaca, 2026-07-28
This document constructs vehicles. It does not recommend a position, a direction or a size. The memo issues no verdict; the book decides whether to own this, on which side, and how large. What follows is the evidence a book needs to know that whatever it decides is fillable.
The framework's rule exists because of a real failure: on HCA the maximum open interest across an entire March-2027 chain was 18 contracts, the default defined-risk spread was uninvestable at any size, and nothing tested for it. A vehicle that cannot be filled is not a vehicle. So the chain comes first.
| 60-day average daily volume (IEX feed) | 218,178 shares |
| 60-day average daily notional (IEX feed) | $37.4m / day |
| Market cap | $36.1bn (diluted) |
| Realised volatility, 252d | 68.4% |
Stated limitation, not hidden. The Alpaca
feed=iexseries prints only IEX-executed volume. IEX is a single venue and routinely represents a low-single-digit percentage of consolidated US equity volume, so $37.4m/day is a floor, not an estimate of consolidated ADV. No multiplier is applied here because none can be evidenced from the data pulled. The floor alone is sufficient: at $37.4m/day a $50m position is ~1.3 days of IEX-only volume and far less of the consolidated tape.
Equity Liquidity: PASS, on the floor alone.
Every row below is a live quote from data.alpaca.markets/v1beta1/options/snapshots, 2026-07-28. Expiry
2027-01-15 (171 days), the only expiry on the board with institutional open interest.
| Contract | Strike | Open interest | Bid | Ask | Mid | Spread as % of mid | IV | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDDT270115C00180000 | 180 C | 836 | 39.43 | 40.77 | 40.10 | 3.3% | 74.6% | 0.631 |
| RDDT270115C00200000 | 200 C | 2,241 | 30.78 | 32.97 | 31.88 | 6.9% | 73.5% | 0.549 |
| RDDT270115C00220000 | 220 C | 28,823 | 24.47 | 26.60 | 25.54 | 8.3% | 73.3% | 0.472 |
| RDDT270115C00250000 | 250 C | 1,438 | 16.95 | 18.74 | 17.84 | 10.0% | 72.1% | 0.368 |
| RDDT270115C00270000 | 270 C | 7,804 | 12.97 | 15.47 | 14.22 | 17.6% | 72.0% | 0.310 |
| RDDT270115P00150000 | 150 P | 1,899 | 17.55 | 19.46 | 18.51 | 10.3% | 76.0% | −0.245 |
| RDDT270115P00120000 | 120 P | 5,489 | 8.07 | 9.28 | 8.68 | 13.9% | 78.2% | −0.135 |
| RDDT270115P00115000 | 115 P | 26,361 | 6.88 | 8.39 | 7.63 | 19.8% | 79.4% | −0.120 |
Whole-chain totals, January 2027: call open interest 40,938 contracts across 20 strikes in the 0.6×–1.6× spot band; maximum single-strike call OI 28,823; maximum single-strike put OI 26,361. Other listed expiries: 2026-11-20 (1,393 call OI), 2026-12-18 (4,628), 2027-03-19 (3,043), 2027-06-17 (10,777).
Liquidity Criteria (BINDING): PASS. The January 2027 chain is genuinely institutional. At 28,823 contracts of open interest on a single strike, a 250-lot is under 1% of open interest.
| ATM implied volatility, Jan-2027 | ~74.5% |
| Realised volatility, trailing 252d | 68.4% |
| IV / RV | 1.09 |
Options are priced at a 9% premium to trailing realised volatility — a normal, unremarkable variance risk premium, and notably not elevated into an imminent earnings print. There is no volatility edge here in either direction. This argues for defined-risk structures over outright long premium, and equally against any thesis that rests on selling "expensive" vol: at 1.09x it is not expensive.
Direction is not asserted. Both sides are constructed because the memo's job is to make either executable.
| Buy | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 220 C (OI 28,823) |
| Sell | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 270 C (OI 7,804) |
| Debit at mid | 25.54 − 14.22 = $11.32 |
| Debit paying the spread (buy ask, sell bid) | 26.60 − 12.97 = $13.63 (+20.4% slippage) |
| Width / max value | $50.00 |
| Max profit at mid entry | $38.68 (3.42 : 1) |
| Max profit at spread entry | $36.37 (2.67 : 1) |
| Breakeven (mid entry) | $231.32, +29.7% from spot |
| Net delta at entry | +0.162 per spread |
| Days to expiry | 171 |
What it expresses. The 12-month target band's lower half ($216–$267, +21% to +50%) fully covers the $270 upper strike within the option's life only at the top of the band. This structure is therefore a tail expression, not a base-case one: it pays if the name re-rates back toward the middle of its own multiple history, and it is worth zero if the name simply grinds sideways.
| Buy | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 200 C (OI 2,241) |
| Sell | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 250 C (OI 1,438) |
| Debit at mid | 31.88 − 17.84 = $14.04 |
| Debit paying the spread | 32.97 − 16.95 = $16.02 (+14.1%) |
| Max profit at mid entry | $35.96 (2.56 : 1) |
| Breakeven (mid entry) | $214.04, +20.0% from spot |
| Net delta at entry | +0.181 |
This is the structure that maps to the base case. Its breakeven of +20.0% sits just below the 25th percentile of Reddit's own multiple history applied to NTM revenue ($215.80, +21.0%). In other words: this spread pays if Reddit does nothing more than trade at a multiple it has been above three-quarters of the time since IPO. Open interest of 2,241/1,438 supports meaningful but not unlimited size — a 100-lot is 4.5% and 7.0% of the respective strikes' open interest, which is executable; a 500-lot is not, at these quotes.
| Buy | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 150 P (OI 1,899) |
| Sell | 1× RDDT 2027-01-15 115 P (OI 26,361) |
| Debit at mid | 18.51 − 7.63 = $10.88 |
| Debit paying the spread | 19.46 − 6.88 = $12.58 (+15.6%) |
| Width | $35.00 |
| Max profit at mid entry | $24.12 (2.22 : 1) |
| Breakeven | $139.12, −22.0% from spot |
| Net delta at entry | −0.125 |
What it expresses. The Downside Criteria bear case is $100 (−44%), driven by a named cause — further loss of US search-referred logged-out traffic — with p=0.30. The 115 strike sits above that bear case, so the structure captures the bulk of it. The $115 put is the single most heavily owned put on the board (26,361 contracts), which is itself information: the market has already built a large position at exactly the level implied by a referral shock.
Nothing about this name requires an option. At $37.4m/day of IEX-only notional and $36bn of market cap, a position of any size a single-name book would take is executable in the common stock, and the common stock avoids paying a 9% variance risk premium for a thesis whose horizon (five years, per the implied-path test) is far longer than any listed expiry.
The framework's active protection is inverse-volatility sizing, and it works because a fat-left-tail name is almost always a high-volatility name and is sized down automatically. The inputs:
| Realised volatility, 252d | 68.4% |
| Implied volatility, Jan-2027 ATM | 74.5% |
| Bear case | $100 (−44%), p = 0.30, named cause: US search-referral traffic loss |
| Volatility tier | High — 68.4% realised places RDDT well above a typical large-cap book's median |
RDDT sizes small on volatility alone. The Downside Criteria is MEASURED and constrains nothing; the volatility does the constraining, which is the framework's stated interim control.
These are thesis invalidations, not stop-losses. They are the events that would make the Research and Valuation documents wrong rather than merely early.